Lehman “has to fill the void and the way to do that is establish what their options are”, says a senior executive at one private equity firm who has been approached and has received documents with information about the business.
The business, which Lehman bought in 2003 for $2.6bn, is today worth as much as $10bn, analysts say.
A spokeswoman for Lehman declined to comment.
Lehman is trying to find the least painful way to fill the hole on its balance sheet at a time when it is hard to raise equity capital – a problem similar to that faced by Merrill Lynch before it sold off its stake in Bloomberg.
Lehman is trying to choose between selling troubled portfolios, such as its commercial real estate assets, or selling crown jewels such as the asset management business. Lehman lacks non-core assets that are easy to hive off, such as Merrill’s stake in Bloomberg.
One challenge in any Neuberger sale would be to keep its portfolio managers from rebelling. At the time of Lehman’s original purchase, 30 top fund managers at Neuberger received share packages with long holding periods. Since that time, Lehman’s share price has collapsed. To keep critical staff from leaving, any buyer would be likely to have to offer generous packages.
“Can you come up with enough economics for employees and still offer Lehman enough to convince them to sell?” asks the private equity executive who has received documents with information about Neuberger.
Private equity firms are keen to expand their assets under management at a time when many are determined to follow Blackstone into the public market.
Similarly, there are money management firms who are not strong in the so-called long-only equity management business, which is considered Neuberger’s core strength.
Dick Fuld, Lehman’s chief executive, is understood to have explored several options. Talks with strategic investors in Asia regarding a stake in the firm itself went nowhere – at least up to now, according to people familiar with the matter.
Some hedge funds (which Lehman spent heavily on to acquire minority stakes in) loyally came forward when Lehman raised capital this spring and were rewarded with heavy losses. Now they are considering buying back those stakes – at a deep discount. Meanwhile, their own poor performance is a further drag on Lehman.
Value of Lehman ex-Neuberger Berman may be negative (Naked Capitalism)
There has been widespread speculation that Lehman was contemplating a sale of Neuberger Berman, whose value is estimated by analysts to vary from less than $7 billion to as high as $13 billion (Lehman’s entire market capitalization is about $10.5 billion).
Connect the dots. The stock market is saying that the value of current Lehman operations ex the asset management business is close to zero, or maybe even negative (which would hold if liabilities exceed the value of the remaining assets). Note that the Journal story puts a narrower value on the asset management operations, $8 to $10 billion.
Of course, the deal-minded would contend otherwise, that Lehman is in effect suffering from a conglomerate discount, and as can happen with public companies, the breakup value is higher than the public market price. If that were true, Lehman should sell its asset management business in toto and use the proceeds to take the rest of the firm private.
A more curious disparity between the two pieces is the spin they put on Lehman's sales activities. Both articles say the firm has sent letters to possible buyers last week. But there was a marked difference in how each paper characterized the move. First, from the Journal:
As it tries to overcome mounting losses on soured mortgage-related assets, Lehman has begun circulating a detailed book of financial information about the investment-management unit to a group that includes private-equity firms Carlyle Group, Hellman & Friedman LLC and General Atlantic LLC, people familiar with the situation said. Blackstone Group LP also has expressed interest in the business in recent weeks, other people familiar with the process said.
Sending out an offering memo means the business is for sale, period. That does not mean a deal will go through; the offers may be deemed to be inadequate. However, oddly, the New York Times article gives an entirely different report on the state of play:
Lehman Brothers, the troubled investment bank, is considering the sale of all or part of its prized money management division to private equity firms...
Lehman sent letters last week to a number of financial companies, including private equity firms like Kohlberg, Kravis & Roberts, J. C. Flowers, the Blackstone Group, the Carlyle Group and Apollo Management, to test interest in its money management division, according to several people briefed on its contents.
The letter, a so-called memorandum of understanding, did not put a value on the division. It said that interested parties could bid for all or some of the pieces but encouraged bidders to make an offer for the whole business.... Lehman’s current talks with private equity are an attempt to put price tags on Neuberger and other pieces of its asset management unit, which should provide flexibility for Lehman executives when they sit down to review third-quarter earnings and calculate if they need to raise capital.
This gives the impression that Lehman is price-shopping to get inputs as to whether it should sell all or part of the operations or not. The reason I doubt this interpretation is you don't circulate "detailed" information to buyers casually. First, the process of shopping a company is time consuming and rattles employees and often leads to defections (although in this case, with Lehman's stock at such lousy levels, the Neuberger principals are believed to be on board with this move). Second, the prospective buyers are all major clients. It would be ill advised to jerk them around.
However, another oddity is the buyer list. Why, for instance, are no Japanese banks included? They are cash-rich, keenly aware of the advantage that confers to them now, (I was at a closing party of sorts for a large loan that one Japanese bank that the borrower, a big financial firm I guarantee you heard of, said European and US banks simply were not doing) and looking for equity investments.
A crude rule of thumb in M&A is that having another bidder in the mix will add 10% to the sales price. That's why, unless there is a need for secrecy or speed, businesses for sale are shopped widely. So the fact that the buyer list includes only private equity firms seems unduly narrow. The Times does offer a possible explanation: "At the same time, many bidders are not interested in buying the whole business because it does not fit with their own model." Many, if not all of the firms already being solicited apparently see this as a strategic purchase, not a portfolio investment. But again, that fact would seem to favor possible buyers with fewer conflicts in terms of existing operations, like the Japanese.
Of course, the assumption may be that now that the sale has been de facto announced in the Times and Journal that other interested parties will contact Lehman.
The Times also indicates that a sale of the entire business may not be viable:
....one of the complications to any potential sale of Lehman’s investment management business is that ratings agencies could determine that the division or its parts are too important to Lehman’s business to sell.
and quotes analysts like Richard Bove of Ladenberg Thalmann that would prefer that 20% of the fund management operations be sold in a public offering