One of the most important issues in the regulatory reform debate is that of systemically important financial institutions. This paper proposes a framework for identifying and supervising such institutions; the framework is designed to remove the advantages they derive from becoming systemically important and to give them more time-consistent incentives. It defines criteria for classifying firms as systemically important: size (the classic doctrine of too big to let fail) and the four C’s of systemic importance (contagion, concentration, correlation, and conditions); it also discusses the concept of progressive systemic mitigation.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
On Systemically Important Financial Institutions and Progressive Systemic Mitigation
By James B. Thomson (Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment